Journal Issue

Outreach Debt and trade dominate legislators’ conference

International Monetary Fund. External Relations Dept.
Published Date:
January 2005
  • ShareShare
Show Summary Details

In a year marked by high-profile initiatives to cancel debt, increase trade openness, and ensure more effective aid, what can parliamentarians do to help bridge the critical distance between promises and progress? At the sixth annual conference of the Parliamentary Network on the World Bank (PNoWB), on October 21–23 in Helsinki, some 200 members of parliament from about 90 countries joined representatives of civil society organizations, think tanks, and multilateral agencies to discuss these issues.

The recent Group of Eight (G8) initiative to cancel debts owed by many of the heavily indebted poor countries (HIPCs) was welcomed by all, but the discussion revealed some uneasiness. Charles Mutasa of the African Forum and Network on Debt and Development, argued that the original HIPC initiative and now the G8 proposal do not include several countries with heavy debt burdens.

The World Bank’s Vikram Nehru cautioned that depending on how many countries are finally included, the cost to the International Development Association (IDA) could jeopardize future lending. Alison Johnson of Debt Relief International echoed these reservations, saying that debt relief should not compromise the IMF’s future lending to low-income countries or to countries facing exogenous shocks. Johnson and others hoped that no additional conditionality would be attached to debt cancellation.

Parliamentarians can also do a lot to ensure that their countries reap the benefits of debt cancellation. Johnson called on delegates from borrowing countries to carefully scrutinize government actions and ensure that relief actually helps countries reach the Millennium Development Goals. Legislators should also monitor borrowing by the executive branch and avoid piling up unsustainable debts again. Mutasa suggested setting up a debt-management office supervised by the parliament. And Nehru urged parliamentarians from donor countries to do their part to see that commitments to compensate IDA are fulfilled.

Waiting for Hong Kong

“When two elephants fight, the grass ends up suffering,” said Mutahi Kagwe, a parliamentarian from Kenya, describing the present state of negotiations between the United States and the European Union (EU) over agricultural subsidies. Pascal Lamy, World Trade Organization Director General, speaking via video link, voiced grave concern that the current U.S. and EU positions were too far apart for negotiations to progress. Should the Hong Kong ministerial meetings collapse, he said, it would derail chances of completing the Doha Development Round by end-2006. Why is agreement so elusive? Bert Koenders, a delegate from the Netherlands and chair of PNoWB, observed that “too often politicians view the world as a risk rather than an opportunity.”

Capacity building

Turning to the role of parliament as watchdog, several speakers lamented that limited resources and information make it difficult to effectively monitor the actions of the executive branch. Among those organizations that can help are the World Bank Institute, which has an extensive parliamentary training program. Peter Koeppinger pointed out that his own organization, the Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung, offers extensive capacity building not only to parliamentarians but also to legislative staff and political parties. Peer training may be even more valuable, suggested Beatrice Kiraso, a parliamentarian from Uganda, and she encouraged legislators to share their experience and knowledge.

Laura Wallace


Sheila Meehan

Managing Editor

Jacqueline Irving

Production Manager

Christine Ebrahim-zadeh Conny Lotze

Senior Editors

Camilla Andersen

Assistant Editor

Maureen Burke Lijun Li

Senior Editorial Assistants

Kelley McCollum

Editorial Assistant

Julio Prego

Graphic Artist

Graham Hacche

Senior Advisor

Prakash Loungani

Associate Editor

The IMF Survey (ISSN 0047-083X) is published in English, French, and Spanish by the IMF 22 times a year, plus IMF in Focus. Opinions and materials in the IMF Survey do not necessarily reflect official views of the IMF. Any maps used are for the convenience of readers, based on National Geographic’s Atlas of the World, Sixth Edition; the denominations used and the boundaries shown do not imply any judgment by the IMF on the legal status of any territory or any endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Text from the IMF Survey may be reprinted, with due credit given, but photographs and illustrations cannot be reproduced in any form. Address editorial correspondence to Current Publications Division, Room 7-106, IMF, Washington, DC 20431 U.S.A. Tel.: (202) 6238585; or e-mail any comments to

To request an IMF Survey subscription ($109.00 annually for private firms and individuals) or IMF publications, please contact IMF Publication Services, Box X2005, IMF, Washington, DC 20431 U.S.A. Tel.: (202) 623-7430; fax: (202) 623- 7201; e-mail: The IMF Survey is mailed first class in Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and by airspeed elsewhere.

Other Resources Citing This Publication